Civil Court Rules and Jury Charges

Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C.
2053 Woodbridge Avenue - Edison, NJ 08817

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

CHARGE 6.12 — Page 1 of 2 6.12 PROXIMATE CAUSE — WHERE THERE IS CLAIM THAT CONCURRENT CAUSES OF HARM WERE PRESENT Civil model jury charge

CHARGE 6.12 — Page 1 of 2 
 6.12 PROXIMATE CAUSE — WHERE THERE IS CLAIM THAT CONCURRENT CAUSES OF HARM WERE PRESENT (Approved 5/98) 
NOTE TO JUDGE 
This charge is designed to address the more complex case where a defendant’s (or a party’s) negligent conduct combines with other causes that lead to the plaintiff’s injury (or harm). Conklin v. Hannoch Weisman, 145 N.J. at 417; Camp v. Jiffy Lube #114, 309 N.J. Super. at 309. However, the present charge is not intended to address those causes where there is an issue as to: (1) the foreseeability of the injury or harm; or (2) an intervening or superseding cause. The trial judge should employ Model Civil Charge 6.13 for cases where the foreseeability of the injury or harm is an issue. Depending upon the facts of the case, Model Civil Charge 6.14 should be used in conjunction with Model Civil Charge 6.12 or 6.13 if there is an issue as to intervening or superseding causes. 
To find proximate cause, you must first find that [name of defendant or other party]’s negligence was a cause of the accident/incident/event. If you find that [name of defendant or other party] is not a cause of the accident/incident/event, then you must find no proximate cause. 
Second, you must find that [name of defendant or other party]’s negligence was a substantial factor that singly, or in combination with other causes, brought about the accident/incident/event or injury/loss/harm claimed by [name of plaintiff]. By substantial, it is meant that it was not a remote, trivial or CHARGE 6.12 — Page 2 of 2 

inconsequential cause. The mere circumstance that there may also be another cause of the accident/incident/event or injury/loss/harm does not mean that there cannot be a finding of proximate cause. Nor is it necessary for the negligence of [name of defendant or other party] to be the sole cause of accident/incident/event or injury/loss/harm. If you find that [name of defendant or other party]’s negligence was a substantial factor in bringing about the accident/incident/event or injury/loss/harm, then you should find that [name of defendant or other party]’s negligence was a proximate cause of the accident/incident/event or injury/loss/harm.