Civil Court Rules and Jury Charges

Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C.
2053 Woodbridge Avenue - Edison, NJ 08817

Sunday, October 12, 2014

SALVATORE PUGLIA VS. ELK PIPELINE, INC., ET AL. A-0886-13T1

 SALVATORE PUGLIA VS. ELK PIPELINE, INC., ET AL. 
A-0886-13T1 

We consider the propriety of the summary judgment dismissal of plaintiff's retaliatory discharge claim under the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -14, based on his lay-off at the near completion of a public works construction project. We conclude plaintiff's claim is dependent on the interpretation of the parties' collective bargaining agreement (CBA). Accordingly, redress is governed by federal law and the state CEPA claim is preempted by section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (LMRA), 29 U.S.C.A. § 185(a), and the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (NLRA), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 151-166.