Civil Court Rules and Jury Charges

Kenneth Vercammen & Associates, P.C.
2053 Woodbridge Avenue - Edison, NJ 08817

Monday, October 26, 2015

8.20 MEDICAL EXPENSES (AUTO) Civil Model Jury Charge

8.20            Medical Expenses (Auto) Civil Model Jury Charge
(Approved 12/96)
         The plaintiff's claim in this case does not include any claims for medical expenses.  Therefore, in determining the reasonable amount of damages due to plaintiff, you shall not speculate about the medical expenses plaintiff may have had.

                                             NOTE TO JUDGE


Roig v. Kelsey, 135 N.J. 500 (1994).  The New Jersey No Fault Law Automobile Reparation Reform Act N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 et seq. bars recovery for the medical expense deductible and 20% co-payment under PIP policies.

8.11 DAMAGES CHARGES — GENERAL I. FUTURE MEDICAL EXPENSES Civil Model Jury Charge

8.11            DAMAGES CHARGES — GENERAL
I.       FUTURE MEDICAL EXPENSES Civil Model Jury Charge
1  (Approved 5/97)
         Plaintiff in this case seeks to recover future medical expenses.  Plaintiff has a right to be compensated for any future medical expenses resulting from the injuries brought about by defendant's wrongdoing.[2]
         If it is reasonably probable that plaintiff will incur medical expenses in the future then you should also include an amount to compensate the plaintiff for those medical expenses.  In deciding how much to award for future medical expenses think about the factors mentioned in discussing the nature, extent and duration of plaintiff's injury.  Also consider plaintiff's age today, his/her general state of health before the accident, and how long you reasonably expect the medical expenses to continue.  Obviously, the time period covering plaintiff's future medical expenses cannot go beyond that point when it is expected that he/she may recover from his/her injuries.[3] 



You should also consider plaintiff's life expectancy in assessing future medical expenses.[4] 
         But you should be aware that the figures that you have been given on life expectancy are only statistical averages.  Do not treat them as necessary or fixed rules, since they are general estimates.  Use them with caution and use your sound judgment in taking them into account. 
         For future medical expenses you must base your decision on the probable amount that plaintiff will incur.  It is the burden of the plaintiff to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, the probable need for future medical care and the reasonableness of the charge for future medical care. 
         In deciding what plaintiff's future medical expenses are, understand that the law does not require of you mathematical exactness.  Rather, you must use sound judgment based on reasonable probability. 
         Once you have decided how much medical care plaintiff will need in the future, you must then consider the effects of inflation and interest.  As to inflation, you should consider the effects it probably will have in reducing the purchasing power of money.  Any award for future medical expenses should be increased to account for losses due to inflation.  The consideration of interest requires that you should not just award plaintiff the exact amount of medical care that he/she will need in the future.  The reason for that is that plaintiff will have that money now even though he/she will not have needed that money until some time in the future.  And that means that plaintiff will be able to invest the money and earn interest on it now even though he/she otherwise would not have had that money to invest until some future date. 
         To make up for this, you must make an adjustment for having the money available now even though the expense will not be experienced until the future.  This adjustment is known as discounting, and what discounting does is give you the value of the money that you get now instead of getting it at some future time.  In other words, it gives you the present value or present worth in a single lump sum of money which otherwise was going to be received over a number of years at so much per year. 
         Your goal is to create a fund of money which will be enough to provide plaintiff future medical care and which will be used up at the end of the total period of need.  In arriving at the amount of that fund — the present value of future need — you should consider the interest the fund would earn, the probable amount by which taxation on the interest would decrease the money available to plaintiff and the effect of inflation in decreasing the purchasing power of money.



[1]  If the attorneys will stipulate as a fact that the interest and inflation rates will offset each other, only paragraphs one, two and three of this section need be charged.
[2]  Coll v. Sherry, 29 N.J. 166, 174 (1959). 
[3]  The collateral source rule (see cases under Model Civil Charges 8.11C and 8.11A) applies to loss of earnings as well as to medical and hospital expenses.  Plaintiff may recover damages for loss of earnings although having been paid wages or their equivalent by employer pursuant to sick or annual leave benefits or retirement on half salary under a pension contract.  Rusk v. Jeffries, 110 N.J.L. 307, 311 (E. & A. 1933).  Chap. 326, L. 1987, eliminates the collateral source rule as to causes of action arising on or after December 18, 1987.  Deduction of benefits, less premiums, is done by the court, not the jury.  See also N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(3) for similar effect for Tort Claims Act causes of action.  See Parker v. Esposito, 291 N.J. Super. 560 (App. Div. 1996) for application of collateral source rule to future benefits. 
[4]  This concept should be charged if there is appropriate evidence received on the subject. 

8.11 DAMAGES CHARGES — GENERAL H. CAPITALIZATION Civil Model Jury Charge

8.11                     DAMAGES CHARGES — GENERAL
         H.      CAPITALIZATION Civil Model Jury Charge
(pre-1984)
         The plaintiff introduced testimony that $ _____ is the amount which if invested today at 3½% compound interest would produce $1.00 per year for the _____ years of his/her life expectancy [or work life expectancy].  You may apply this figure of $ _____ in your award of damages, if any, for future loss of earnings but you need not do so or you may make such adjustment in it as you determine to be fair and reasonable.
         If you apply the figure of $______, do so as follows:  determine the amount of the plaintiff's loss of earnings proximately caused by this injury and disability starting today into the future.  This may be an amount based upon the difference between what you find the plaintiff would have earned if it had not been for this injury and disability and what you find he/she will earn in such employment as he/she is physically capable of undertaking.  Reach your calculation of the amount to be awarded for his/her future loss of earnings by multiplying $______ by what you have determined to be the plaintiff's average dollar loss of earnings per year from now into the future.  That amount, or such other amount as you arrive at fairly and reasonably, should be included in your verdict to compensate the plaintiff for his/her future loss of earnings.



                                             NOTE TO JUDGE

This model charge may be adapted to provide a formula for calculation of the pecuniary loss to the dependents or next of kin in wrongful death actions.

Further explanatory language to supplement this model charge:  "The law says we must ascertain the present value of future losses.  Our rules have provided a method which may be used in ascertaining the present value of future losses.  There is a difference in the value of an amount of money given as a lump sum at the present time and the present value of the same amount given in periodic future payments, such as weekly (monthly) contributions over a period of years during the next of kin's anticipated life expectancy.  A sum of money due at some future time is not worth that much today because if you were paid today you would have the money to invest and it would earn interest.  You take the amount you wish to have in the future and discount it, that is, reduce it making allowance for the interest you would earn by getting the money earlier." 

Cases:
        

Koppovich v. LeWinter, 43 N.J. Super. 528, 533 (App. Div. 1957), certif. den. 24 N.J. 112 (1957); Dickerson v. Mutual Grocery Co., 100 N.J.L. 118, 120 (E. & A. 1924).