NJAC 1:1-14.6 Judge’s powers in presiding over prehearing activities, conducting hearings, developing records and rendering initial decisions

NJAC 1:1-14.6 Judge’s powers in presiding over prehearing activities, conducting hearings, developing records and rendering initial decisions

		(a) The judge may schedule any form of hearing or proceeding and establish appropriate location areas and instruct the Clerk to issue all appropriate notices.

		(b) When required in individual cases, the judge may supersede any notice issued by the Clerk by informing the parties and the Clerk of this action.

		(c) Depending on the needs of the case, the judge may schedule additional hearing dates, declare scheduled hearing dates unnecessary, or schedule any number of in-person conferences or telephone conferences.

		(d) When required in individual cases, the judge at any time of the proceeding may convert any form of proceeding into another, whether more or less formal or whether in-person or by telephone.

		(e) The judge may bifurcate hearings whenever there are multiple parties, issues or claims, and the nature of the case is such that a hearing of all issues in one proceeding may be complex and confusing, or whenever a substantial saving of time would result from conducting separate hearings or whenever bifurcation might eliminate the need for further hearings.

		(f) The judge may establish special accelerated or decelerated schedules to meet the special needs of the parties or the particular case.

		(g) The judge may administer any oaths or affirmations required or may direct a certified court reporter to perform this function.

		(h) The judge may render any ruling or order necessary to decide any matter presented to him or her which is within the jurisdiction of the transmitting agency or the agency conducting the hearing.

		(i) The judge shall control the presentation of the evidence and the development of the record and shall determine admissibility of all evidence produced. The judge may permit narrative testimony whenever appropriate.

		(j) The judge may utilize his or her sanction powers to ensure the proper conduct of the parties and their representatives appearing in the matter.

		(k) The judge may limit the presentation of oral or documentary evidence, the submission of rebuttal evidence and the conduct of cross-examination.

		(l) The judge may determine that the party with the burden of proof shall not begin the presentation of evidence and may require another party to proceed first.

		(m) The judge may make such rulings as are necessary to prevent argumentative, repetitive or irrelevant questioning and to expedite the cross-examination to an extent consistent with disclosure of all relevant testimony and information.

		(n) The judge may compel production of relevant materials, files, records and documents and may issue subpoenas to compel the appearance of any witness when he or she believes that the witness or produced materials may assist in a full and true disclosure of the facts.

		(o) The judge may require any party at any time to clarify confusion or gaps in the proofs. The judge may question any witness to further develop the record.

		(p) The judge may take such other actions as are necessary for the proper, expeditious and fair conduct of the hearing or other proceeding, development of the record and rendering of a decision.

		Administrative Procedures

		CASE NOTES:

		Where a confidential informant‘s statements served as evidence in a disciplinary action against a correction officer for engaging in an inappropriate relationship with an inmate, but the informant was not called as a witness during the hearing, the matter was remanded to allow the appointing authority to call the confidential informant as a witness; if the appointing authority did not call the confidential informant, the ALJ was authorized to act in its stead to take the testimony. In re Smith, OAL Dkt. No. CSV 4528-07, 2008 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 136, Remand Decision (January 30, 2008).

		Record needed to be developed to facilitate review of ALJ‘s determination that a senior correction officer was improperly dismissed after he tested positive for marijuana because the expert‘s testimony was not transcribed and the parties offered conflicting interpretations of what the testimony was; the ALJ was authorized to take the expert‘s testimony to clarify the urine testing process, including appropriate cut-off levels, and the margin of error associated with such testing (remanding 2007 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 140). In re Fuller, OAL Dkt. No. CSV 439-06, 2007 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 1124, Remand Decision (November 8, 2007).

		ALJ properly limited the evidence to whether a police officer was successfully re-trained, as required by a settlement agreement between the officer and the appointing authority arising out of a prior disciplinary matter; the allegations giving rise to the prior disciplinary proceeding did not need to be considered in determining whether the officer had fulfilled his obligations under the agreement (adopting 2007 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 242). In re MacDonald, OAL Dkt. No. CSV 474-05, 2007 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 1133, Merit System Board Decision (August 29, 2007).

NJAC 1:1-15.9 Expert and other opinion testimony

NJAC

1:1-15.9 Expert and other opinion testimony

		(a) If a witness is not testifying as an expert, testimony of that witness in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to such opinions or inferences as the judge finds:

		1. May be rationally based on the perception of the witness; and

		2. Are helpful to a clear understanding of the witness’ testimony or to the fact in issue.

		(b) If a witness is testifying as an expert, testimony of that witness in the form of opinions or inferences is admissible if such testimony will assist the judge to understand the evidence or determine a fact in issue and the judge finds the opinions or inferences are:

		1. Based on facts and data perceived by or made known to the witness at or before the hearing; and

		2. Within the scope of the special knowledge, skill, experience or training possessed by the witness.

		(c) Testimony in the form of opinion or inferences which is otherwise admissible is not objectionable because it embraces the ultimate issue or issues to be decided by the judge.

		(d) A witness may be required, before testifying in terms of opinions or inference, to be first examined concerning the data upon which the opinion or inference is based.

		(e) Questions calling for the opinion of an expert witness need not be hypothetical in form unless, in the discretion of the judge, such form is required.

		(f) If facts and data are of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field in forming opinions or inferences upon the subject, those facts and data upon which an expert witness bases opinion testimony need not be admissible in evidence.

		Administrative Procedures

		CASE NOTES

		Adopting and modifying on other grounds Initial Decision (2005 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 1070), which found the testimony of the manufacturer‘s witness to be lacking in foundation and not credible where the witness testified that the after-market installation of a snowplow on the consumer‘s truck could have been the cause of the vehicle‘s intermittent shutting down without warning; although the administrative rules give an ALJ latitude in admitting evidence, an expert‘s opinion must still be based on factual evidence. Marago v. Daimler Chrysler Motors Co., OAL Dkt. No. CMA 8775-05, 2005 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 1070, Final Decision (December 22, 2005)

NJAC 1:1-15.8 Witnesses; requirements for testifying; testifying by telephone

NJAC 1:1-15.8 Witnesses; requirements for testifying; testifying by telephone

		(a) Except as otherwise provided by this subchapter, by statute or by rule establishing a privilege:

		1. Every person is qualified to be a witness; and

		2. No person has a privilege to refuse to be a witness; and

		3. No person is disqualified to testify to any matter; and

		4. No person has a privilege to refuse to disclose any matter or to produce any object or writing; and

		5. No person has a privilege that another shall not be a witness or shall not disclose any matter or shall not produce any object or writing but the judge presiding at the hearing in a contested case may not testify as a witness.

		(b) A person is disqualified to be a witness if the judge finds the proposed witness is incapable of expression concerning the matter so as to be understood by the judge directly or through interpretation by one who can understand the witness, or the proposed witness is manifestly incapable of understanding the duty of a witness to tell the truth. An interpreter is subject to all the provisions of these rules relating to witnesses.

		(c) As a prerequisite for the testimony of a witness there must be evidence that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter, or has special experience, training or education, if such is required. Such evidence may be provided by the testimony of the witness. In exceptional circumstances, the judge may receive the testimony of a witness conditionally, subject to evidence of knowledge, experience, training or education being later supplied in the course of the proceedings. Personal knowledge may be obtained through hearsay.

		(d) A witness may not testify without taking an oath or affirming to tell the truth under the penalty provided by law. No witness may be barred from testifying because of religion or lack of it.

		(e) Testimony of a witness may be presented by telephone if, before the hearing begins, the judge finds there is good cause for permitting the witness to testify by telephone. In determining whether good cause exists, the judge shall consider:

		1. Whether all parties consent to the taking of testimony by telephone;

		2. Whether credibility is an issue;

		3. The significance of the witness’ testimony;

		4. The reason for the request to take testimony by telephone; and

		5. Any other relevant factor.

		(f) Testimony of a witness may be given in narrative fashion rather than by question and answer format if the judge permits.

NJAC 1:1-15.8 Witnesses; requirements for testifying; testifying by telephone

NJAC 1:1-15.8 Witnesses; requirements for testifying; testifying by telephone

		(a) Except as otherwise provided by this subchapter, by statute or by rule establishing a privilege:

		1. Every person is qualified to be a witness; and

		2. No person has a privilege to refuse to be a witness; and

		3. No person is disqualified to testify to any matter; and

		4. No person has a privilege to refuse to disclose any matter or to produce any object or writing; and

		5. No person has a privilege that another shall not be a witness or shall not disclose any matter or shall not produce any object or writing but the judge presiding at the hearing in a contested case may not testify as a witness.

		(b) A person is disqualified to be a witness if the judge finds the proposed witness is incapable of expression concerning the matter so as to be understood by the judge directly or through interpretation by one who can understand the witness, or the proposed witness is manifestly incapable of understanding the duty of a witness to tell the truth. An interpreter is subject to all the provisions of these rules relating to witnesses.

		(c) As a prerequisite for the testimony of a witness there must be evidence that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter, or has special experience, training or education, if such is required. Such evidence may be provided by the testimony of the witness. In exceptional circumstances, the judge may receive the testimony of a witness conditionally, subject to evidence of knowledge, experience, training or education being later supplied in the course of the proceedings. Personal knowledge may be obtained through hearsay.

		(d) A witness may not testify without taking an oath or affirming to tell the truth under the penalty provided by law. No witness may be barred from testifying because of religion or lack of it.

		(e) Testimony of a witness may be presented by telephone if, before the hearing begins, the judge finds there is good cause for permitting the witness to testify by telephone. In determining whether good cause exists, the judge shall consider:

		1. Whether all parties consent to the taking of testimony by telephone;

		2. Whether credibility is an issue;

		3. The significance of the witness’ testimony;

		4. The reason for the request to take testimony by telephone; and

		5. Any other relevant factor.

		(f) Testimony of a witness may be given in narrative fashion rather than by question and answer format if the judge permits.

NJAC 1:1-15.7 Exhibits

NJAC 1:1-15.7 Exhibits

		(a) The verbatim record of the proceedings shall include references to all exhibits and, as to each, the offering party, a brief description of the exhibit stated by the offering party or the judge, and the marking directed by the judge. The verbatim record shall also include a record of the exhibits retained by the judge at the end of the proceedings and of the disposition then made of the other exhibits.

		(b) Parties shall provide each party to the case with a copy of any exhibit offered into evidence. Large exhibits that cannot be placed within the judge‘s file may be either photographed, attached to the file, or described in the record and committed to the safekeeping of a party. All other admitted exhibits shall be retained in the judge‘s file until certified to the agency head pursuant to N.J.A.C. 1:1-18.1.

		(c) The standard marking for exhibits shall be:

		1. P = petitioner;

		2. R = respondent;

		3. A = appellant;

		4. J = joint;

		5. C = judge;

		6. I = intervenor; or

		7. Such other additional markings required for clarity as the judge may direct.

		Chapter Notes

NJAC 1:1-15.6 Authentication and content of writings

NJAC 1:1-15.6 Authentication and content of writings

		Any writing offered into evidence which has been disclosed to each other party at least 10 days prior to the hearing shall be presumed authentic. At the hearing any party may raise questions of authenticity. Where a genuine question of authenticity is raised the judge may require some authentication of the questioned document. For these purposes the judge may accept a submission of proof, in the form of an affidavit, certified document or other similar proof, no later than 10 days after the date of the hearing.

NJAC 1:1-15.6 Authentication and content of writings

NJAC 1:1-15.6 Authentication and content of writings

		Any writing offered into evidence which has been disclosed to each other party at least 10 days prior to the hearing shall be presumed authentic. At the hearing any party may raise questions of authenticity. Where a genuine question of authenticity is raised the judge may require some authentication of the questioned document. For these purposes the judge may accept a submission of proof, in the form of an affidavit, certified document or other similar proof, no later than 10 days after the date of the hearing.

NJAC 1:1-15.4 Privileges

NJAC

1:1-15.4 Privileges

		The rules of privilege recognized by law or contained in the following New Jersey Rules of Evidence shall apply in contested cases to the extent permitted by the context and similarity of circumstances: N.J.R.E. 502 (Definition of Incrimination); N.J.R.E. 503 (Self-incrimination); N.J.R.E. 504 (Lawyer-Client Privilege); N.J.S.A. 45:14B-28 (Psychologist‘s Privilege); N.J.S.A. 2A:84-22.1 et seq. (Patient and Physician Privilege); N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.8 and N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.9 (Information and Data of Utilization Review Committees of Hospitals and Extended Care Facilities); N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.13 et seq. (Victim Counselor Privilege); N.J.R.E. 508 (Newsperson‘s Privilege); N.J.R.E. 509 (Marital Privilege-Confidential Communications); N.J.S.A. 45:8B-29 (Marriage Counselor Privilege); N.J.R.E. 511 (Cleric-Penitent Privilege); N.J.R.E. 512 and 610 (Religious Belief); N.J.R.E. 513 (Political Vote); N.J.R.E. 514 (Trade Secret); N.J.R.E. 515 (Official Information); N.J.R.E. 516 (Identity of Informer); N.J.R.E. 530 (Waiver of Privilege by Contract or Previous Disclosure; Limitations); N.J.R.E. 531 (Admissibility of Disclosure Wrongfully Compelled); N.J.R.E. 532 (Reference to Exercise of Privileges); and N.J.R.E. 533 (Effect of Error in Overruling Claim of Privilege).

NJAC 1:1-15.2 Official notice

NJAC 1:1-15.2 Official notice

		(a) Official notice may be taken of judicially noticeable facts as explained in N.J.R.E. 201 of the New Jersey Rules of Evidence.

		(b) Official notice may be taken of generally recognized technical or scientific facts within the specialized knowledge of the agency or the judge.

		(c) Parties must be notified of any material of which the judge intends to take official notice, including preliminary reports, staff memoranda or other noticeable data. The judge shall disclose the basis for taking official notice and give the parties a reasonable opportunity to contest the material so noticed.

		Chapter Notes

NJAC 1:1-15.1 General rules

NJAC 1:1-15.1 General rules

		(a) Only evidence which is admitted by the judge and included in the record shall be considered.

		(b) Evidence rulings shall be made to promote fundamental principles of fairness and justice and to aid in the ascertainment of truth.

		(c) Parties in contested cases shall not be bound by statutory or common law rules of evidence or any formally adopted in the New Jersey Rules of Evidence except as specifically provided in these rules. All relevant evidence is admissible except as otherwise provided herein. A judge may, in his or her discretion, exclude any evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk that its admission will either:

		1. Necessitate undue consumption of time; or

		2. Create substantial danger of undue prejudice or confusion.

		(d) If the judge finds at the hearing that there is no bona fide dispute between the parties as to any unstipulated material fact, such fact may be proved by any relevant evidence, and exclusionary rules shall not apply, except for (c) above or a valid claim of privilege.

		(e) When the rules in this subchapter state that the qualification of a person to be a witness, or the admissibility of evidence, or the existence of a privilege is subject to a condition, and the fulfillment of the condition is in issue, the judge shall hold a preliminary inquiry to determine the issue. The judge shall indicate which party has the burden of producing evidence and the burden of proof on such issue as implied by the rule under which the question arises. No evidence may be excluded in determining such issue except pursuant to the judge‘s discretion under (c) above or a valid claim of privilege. This provision shall not be construed to restrict or limit the right of a party to introduce evidence subsequently which is relevant to weight or credibility.

NJAC 1:1-9.1 Scheduling of proceedings

NJAC

1:1-9.1 Scheduling of proceedings

		(a) When a contested case is filed, it may be scheduled for mediation, settlement conference, prehearing conference, proceeding on the papers, telephone hearing, plenary hearing or other proceeding.

		(b) To schedule a proceeding, the Clerk or the judge‘s secretary may contact the parties to arrange a convenient date, time and place or may prepare and serve notice without first contacting the parties. Proceedings shall be scheduled for suitable locations, taking into consideration the convenience of the witnesses and the parties, as well as the nature of the case and proceedings.

		(c) The Clerk may schedule a settlement conference whenever such a proceeding may be appropriate and productive. The Clerk may schedule mediation whenever all parties concur.

		(d) A prehearing conference may be scheduled in any case whenever necessary to foster an efficient and expeditious proceeding.

		(e) A proceeding on the papers may be scheduled in accordance with N.J.A.C. 1:1-14.8 for:

		1. Division of Motor Vehicles cases dealing with excessive points and surcharges, pursuant to N.J.A.C. 1:13;

		2. Department of Environmental Protection cases involving emergency water supply allocation plan exemptions, pursuant to N.J.A.C. 1:7; and

		3. Any other class of suitable cases which the Director of the Office of Administrative Law and the transmitting agency agree could be lawfully decided on the papers.

		(f) A telephone hearing may be scheduled for any case when the judge so directs, subject to the requirements of N.J.A.C. 1:1-15.8(e).

NJAC 1:1-12.7 Disposition of motions

NJAC 1:1-12.7 Disposition of motions

		Disposition of motions which completely conclude a case shall be by initial decision. Disposition of all other motions shall be by order.

NJAC 1:1-12.6 Emergency relief

NJAC

1:1-12.6 Emergency relief

		(a) Where authorized by law and where irreparable harm will result without an expedited decision granting or prohibiting some action or relief connected with a contested case, emergency relief pending a final decision on the whole contested case may be ordered upon the application of a party.

		(b) Applications for emergency relief shall be made directly to the agency head and may not be made to the Office of Administrative Law.

		(c) An agency head receiving an application for emergency relief may either hear the application or forward the matter to the Office of Administrative Law for hearing on the application for emergency relief. When forwarded to the Office of Administrative Law, the application shall proceed in accordance with (i) through (k) below. All applications for emergency relief shall be heard on an expedited basis.

		(d) The moving party must serve notice of the request for emergency relief on all parties. Proof of service will be required if the adequacy of notice is challenged. Opposing parties shall be given ample opportunity under the circumstances to respond to an application for emergency relief.

		(e) Where circumstances require some immediate action by the agency head to preserve the subject matter of the application pending the expedited hearing, or where a party applies for emergency relief under circumstances which do not permit an opposing party to be fully heard, the agency head may issue an order granting temporary relief. Temporary relief may continue until the agency head issues a decision on the application for emergency relief.

		(f) When temporary relief is granted by an agency head under circumstances which do not permit an opposing party to be fully heard, temporary relief shall:

		1. Be based upon specific facts shown by affidavit or oral testimony, that the moving party has made an adequate, good faith effort to provide notice to the opposing party, or that notice would defeat the purpose of the application for relief;

		2. Include a finding that immediate and irreparable harm will probably result before adequate notice can be given;

		3. Be based on the likelihood that the moving party will prevail when the application is fully argued by all parties;

		4. Be as limited in scope and temporary as is possible to allow the opposing party to be given notice and to be fully heard on the application; and

		5. Contain a provision for serving and notifying all parties and for scheduling a hearing before the agency head or for transmitting the application to Office of Administrative Law.

		(g) Upon determining any application for emergency relief, the agency head shall forthwith issue and immediately serve upon the parties a written order on the application. If the application is related to a contested case that has been transmitted to Office of Administrative Law, the agency head shall also serve the Clerk of Office of Administrative Law with a copy of the order.

		(h) Applications to an agency head for emergent relief in matters previously transmitted to the Office of Administrative Law shall not delay the scheduling or conduct of hearings, unless the presiding judge determines that a postponement is necessary due to special requirements of the case, because of probable prejudice or for other good cause.

		(i) Upon determining an application for emergency relief, the judge forthwith shall issue to the parties, the agency head and the Clerk a written order on the application. The Clerk shall file with the agency head any papers in support of or opposition to the application which were not previously filed with the agency and a sound recording of the oral argument on the application, if any oral argument has occurred.

		(j) The agency head‘s review of the judge‘s order shall be completed without undue delay but no later than 45 days from entry of the judge‘s order, except when, for good cause shown and upon notice to the parties, the time period is extended by the joint action of the Director of the Office of Administrative Law and the agency head. Where the agency head does not act on review of the judge‘s order within 45 days, the judge‘s order shall be deemed adopted.

		(k) Review by an agency head of a judge‘s order for emergency relief shall not delay the scheduling or conduct of hearings in the Office of Administrative Law, unless the presiding judge determines that a postponement is necessary due to special requirements of the case, because of probable prejudice or for other good cause.

		Administrative Procedures

		CASE NOTES:

		Student who was precluded from participating in graduation ceremonies following his suspension for possession of illegal drugs was not entitled to emergent relief because, although the student could show that he would be irreparably harmed by not participating, he failed to also show that he had the legal right to participate, that he had a likelihood of success on the merits of his underlying appeal, or that the balance of interests and equities under the circumstances rested in his favor (modifying 2009 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 470). Nabel v. Bd. of Educ. of Hazlet, OAL Dkt. No. EDU 8026-09, 2009 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 841, Emergent Relief Decision (June 24, 2009).

		Initial Decision (2009 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 464) adopted, which found that, while denial of attendance at graduation exercises generally did not constitute irreparable harm, the student may suffer irreparable harm if, after a plenary hearing, it was subsequently determined that he had, in fact, earned a passing grade in his eleventh-grade English class, as he contended. The Board did not deny that the student‘s class folder was missing, nor did it introduce the school‘s attendance records or so much as an affidavit or certification from the teacher or any other witness addressing the student‘s contentions; therefore, since it may yet be proven that the teacher made a promise to the student and/or that the student did earn a final passing grade, the denial of attendance would have, under the facts of this case, caused irreparable harm. Tomlin v. Bd. of Educ. of Lower Cape May Reg‘l School Dist., OAL Dkt. No. EDU 4952-09, 2009 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 921, Emergent Relief Decision (June 22, 2009).

		Parents of an autistic child, with severe language disorder and classified as preschool disabled, failed to satisfy all of the criteria for the granting of emergent relief relative to the change in speech therapy; however, as the board of education admitted that it had not provided the occupational therapy required by the child‘s IEP, the motion for emergent relief was granted as to those services. J.W. and E.W. ex rel. B.W. v. Tinton Falls Bd. of Educ., OAL DKT. NO. EDS 2200-08, 2008 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 165, Emergent Relief Decision (March 24, 2008).

		Adult classified special education student with disciplinary problems was precluded from attending Senior Prom. P.P. v. Westwood Board, 95 N.J.A.R.2d (EDS) 165.

NJAC 1:1-12.5 Motion for summary decision; when and how made; partial summary decision

		(a) A party may move for summary decision upon all or any of the substantive issues in a contested case. Such motion must be filed no later than 30 days prior to the first scheduled hearing date or by such date as ordered by the judge.

		(b) The motion for summary decision shall be served with briefs and with or without supporting affidavits. The decision sought may be rendered if the papers and discovery which have been filed, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact challenged and that the moving party is entitled to prevail as a matter of law. When a motion for summary decision is made and supported, an adverse party in order to prevail must by responding affidavit set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue which can only be determined in an evidentiary proceeding. Such response must be filed within 20 days of service of the motion. A reply, if any, must be filed no later than 10 days thereafter. If the adverse party does not so respond, a summary decision, if appropriate, shall be entered.

		(c) Motions for summary decision shall be decided within 45 days from the due date of the last permitted responsive filing. Any motion for summary decision not decided by an agency head which fully disposes of the case shall be treated as an initial decision under N.J.A.C. 1:1-18. Any partial summary decision shall be treated as required by (e) and (f) below.

		(d) If, on motion under this section, a decision is not rendered upon all the substantive issues in the contested case and a hearing is necessary, the judge at the time of ruling on the motion, by examining the papers on file in the case as well as the motion papers, and by interrogating counsel, if necessary, shall, if practicable, ascertain what material facts exist without substantial controversy and shall thereupon enter an order specifying those facts and directing such further proceedings in the contested case as are appropriate. At the hearing in the contested case, the facts so specified shall be deemed established.

		(e) A partial summary decision order shall by its terms not be effective until a final agency decision has been rendered on the issue, either upon interlocutory review pursuant to N.J.A.C. 1:1-14.10 or at the end of the contested case, pursuant toN.J.A.C. 1:1-18.6. However, at the discretion of the judge, for the purpose of avoiding unnecessary litigation or expense by the parties, the order may be submitted to the agency head for immediate review as an initial decision, pursuant to N.J.A.C. 1:1-18.3(c)12. If the agency head concludes that immediate review of the order will not avoid unnecessary litigation or expense, the agency head may return the matter to the judge and indicate that the order will be reviewed at the end of the contested case. Within 10 days after a partial summary decision order is filed with the agency head, the Clerk shall certify a copy of pertinent portions of the record to the agency head.

		(f) Review by the agency head of any partial summary decision shall not cause delay in scheduling hearing dates or result in a postponement of any scheduled hearing dates unless the judge assigned to the case orders that a postponement is necessary because of special requirements, possible prejudice, unproductive effort or other good cause.